<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>They Would Say ThatTweets | They Would Say That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/tag/tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk</link>
	<description>Thoughts On Politics, Authority &#38; Big Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Most Twittering And Tweets Are Junk</title>
		<link>http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/most-twittering-and-tweets-are-junk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/most-twittering-and-tweets-are-junk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk on twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will come as no surprise to many that some research into the use of twitter has found that a large proportion og tweets are complete rubbish. The research and analysis group Pear Analytics has found in their report that more than 40% of tweets were what they described as &#8216;babble&#8217; i.e. pointless messages of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will come as no surprise to many that some research into the use of twitter has found that a large proportion og tweets are complete rubbish.</p>
<p>The research and analysis group Pear Analytics has found in their <a title="twitter babble" href="http://www.pearanalytics.com/2009/twitter-study-reveals-interesting-results-about-usage/" target="_blank">report</a> that more than 40% of tweets were what they described as &#8216;babble&#8217; i.e. pointless messages of little interest to anyone.  Conversational tweets between friends came to just over 37% and it would seem that people do use the service as an instant messenger to contact friends.</p>
<p>The percentage of what could be described as interesting news that you might want to share with the rest of the world came out at 8.7% so it would seem that some people do use the service to spread interesting news, a lot more people chat to friends but the largest section is simply junk but I think we would have thought that anyway.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to compare these figures with phone conversations. I wonder if they wouldn&#8217;t have similar figures.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Most+Twittering+And+Tweets+Are+Junk+http%3A%2F%2Ftheywouldsaythat.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D89" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theywouldsaythat.co.uk/most-twittering-and-tweets-are-junk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

